Compare to Other Years

Complaints

Showing 4 of 4
Jun 27, 2005 Suspension 66,000 mi

THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE ARM THAT HOLDS THE WHEEL ON THE VEHICLE BROKE OFF, IT RIPPED PART OF THE FRAME. THE SERVICE DEALER STATED IT WAS A DEFECT WITHIN THE VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER SAID THEY WOULD PROVIDE $500 TOWARD THE PURCHASE OF A NEW VEHICLE OR THEY WOULD PROVIDE THE WELDING OF THE WHE...

Jun 27, 2005 Structure 66,000 mi

THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE ARM THAT HOLDS THE WHEEL ON THE VEHICLE BROKE OFF, IT RIPPED PART OF THE FRAME. THE SERVICE DEALER STATED IT WAS A DEFECT WITHIN THE VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER SAID THEY WOULD PROVIDE $500 TOWARD THE PURCHASE OF A NEW VEHICLE OR THEY WOULD PROVIDE THE WELDING OF THE WHE...

Jun 27, 2005 Suspension 66,000 mi

THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE ARM THAT HOLDS THE WHEEL ON THE VEHICLE BROKE OFF, IT RIPPED PART OF THE FRAME. THE SERVICE DEALER STATED IT WAS A DEFECT WITHIN THE VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER SAID THEY WOULD PROVIDE $500 TOWARD THE PURCHASE OF A NEW VEHICLE OR THEY WOULD PROVIDE THE WELDING OF THE WHE...

Jun 27, 2005 Structure 66,000 mi

THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE ARM THAT HOLDS THE WHEEL ON THE VEHICLE BROKE OFF, IT RIPPED PART OF THE FRAME. THE SERVICE DEALER STATED IT WAS A DEFECT WITHIN THE VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER SAID THEY WOULD PROVIDE $500 TOWARD THE PURCHASE OF A NEW VEHICLE OR THEY WOULD PROVIDE THE WELDING OF THE WHE...