1997 CHEVROLET TAHOE Service Brakes, Hydraulic Problems

119 complaints about Service Brakes, Hydraulic

119
Complaints
10
Crashes
0
Fires
0
Deaths

High Severity Issue

This component has been associated with crashes, fires, or deaths.

This Problem Across All Years

All Service Brakes, Hydraulic Complaints (119)

May 6, 2012

WHEN PULLING OUT OF DRIVEWAY, BRAKE PEDDLE WENT TO FLOOR. PULLED BACK INTO GARAGE TO SEE WHAT CAUSED THE PROBLEM AND FOUND THAT THE BRAKE LINE RUNNING DOWN DRIVERS SIDE FRAME RAIL WAS RUSTED THROUGH BACK BY WHERE IT EXITS THE FRAME TO GO TO THE T FITTING FOR REAR BRAKES. *TR

Mileage: 146,089

Jul 17, 2011

MY WIFE WAS DRIVING MY 97 CHEVY TAHOE HOME WITH MY 2 KIDS IN THE TRUCK WHEN THE REAR BRAKE LINE BLEW. LUCKILY SHE DIDN'T HAVE TO COME TO A QUICK STOP. WHEN SHE GOT HOME I INSPECTED THE BRAKES AND FOUND THE REAR BRAKE LINE RUSTED OUT AND LOOKED AT THE REST OF THEM THEY ARE ALL RUSTED SEVERELY. *TR

Mileage: 171,301

Sep 29, 2008

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 CHEVROLET TAHOE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE ABS ENGAGES WHEN THE GROUND IS DRY AND PULSATES VERY HARD WHEN STOPPING THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE WAS NOTICED WHILE DRIVING 10 MPH. HE STATED THAT THIS SHOULD ONLY HAPPEN WHEN THERE IS SNOW ON THE GROUND OR WHEN IT IS WET. IN NOVEMBER OF 2000, THERE WAS A VOLUNTARY RECALL AND CHEVROLET REPAIRED THE BRAKES. THERE WERE NO FAILURES FOR 18,000 MILES. CURRENTLY, AT 40,500 MILES, THE FAILURE HAS RECURRED. THE CONTACT CALLED THE MANUFACTURER AND THEY STATED THAT THERE WAS NO RECALL FOR THE BRAKE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 40,500. UPDATED 10/16/08. *LJ THE DEALER REPLACED THE LEFT FRONT HUB. UPDATED 10/17/08. *JB

Mileage: 40,500

Mar 28, 2008

FOR ABOUT A YEAR I HAVE NOTICED THAT THE ABS BRAKING SYSTEM ACTIVATES INTERMITTENTLY ON DRY PAVEMENT AT SLOW SPEEDS, MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE ISSUE HAS BECOME INCREASINGLY PROBLEMATIC, ACTIVATING NEARLY EVERY TIME I APPLY THE BRAKES (MANY TIMES EVEN IF I DON'T APPLY THE BRAKES!) AND I AM NOT COMFORTABLE DRIVING THE VEHICLE FOR FEAR THAT I MAY NOT COMPLETELY STOP BEFORE MAKING CONTACT WITH THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF ME. ALTHOUGH THERE IS A RECALL REGARDING THE FAILURE OF THE ABS SYSTEM ON CHEVY TAHOES, IT DOES NOT INCLUDE VEHICLES MANUFACTURED IN 1997. I RESEARCHED THE PROBLEM AND FOUND THAT THE NHTSA WEB SITE HAD POSTED A REMEDY: REMOVE THE WHEEL SPEED SENSOR AND CLEAN THE WHEEL SPEED SURFACE, GREASE THE MOUNTING SURFACE, REINSTALL THE WHEEL SPEED SENSOR AND CHECK THE PEAK-TO-PEAK OUTPUT VOLTAGE TO ENSURE THE WHEEL SPEED SIGNAL IS WITHIN SPECIFICATIONS. I TOOK A COPY OF THE REMEDY TO MY MECHANIC, WHO PROMPTLY FOLLOWED THE INSTRUCTIONS AND NOTIFIED ME THAT THE REMEDY FAILED TO FIX THE PROBLEM. I CONTACTED AN NHTSA CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AND ASKED IF AN INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN LAUNCHED REGARDING THIS DEFECT AND WAS INFORMED THAT THERE IS NO INVESTIGATION AS OF YET. WITH ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS I HAVE BEEN READING REGARDING THIS PROBLEM, MY QUESTION IS: WHY HASN'T THIS ISSUE OF ABS SYSTEM FAILURE IN 1997 TAHOES BEEN ADDRESSED? IF THE PROBLEM IS OCCURRING IN VEHICLES (REGARDLESS OF THE YEAR MODEL) AND THE RECALL HAS BEEN LIMITED TO ONLY A FEW YEAR MODELS, DOES THIS MEAN THAT THE ABS SYSTEM FAILURE ON THE 1997 TAHOE IS NO CAUSE FOR CONCERN REGARDING SAFETY? I AM REQUESTING THE BOARD TO LOOK AGAIN AT THE ABS COMPLAINTS AND INITIATE AN INVESTIGATION SO THAT GM WILL TAKE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF THE ABS SYSTEM. THANK YOU. *TR

Mileage: 89,500

Mar 12, 2008

ABS ACTIVATION DURING SLOW MOTION, UNDER 10MPH. THIS IS THE THIRD TIME I'VE HAD THIS PROBLEM. BOTH TIMES ONE OF THE HUBS HAD TO BE REPLACED. THIS TIME I ASKED THE MECHANIC TO CLEAN THE SENSORS (AS SUGGESTED BY CHEVY SERVICE UPDATES) TO TRY AND SAVE MONEY. IT DIDN'T WORK ALONG WITH TRYING TO REPLACE THE SENSOR. NOW I HAVE TO HAVE A HUB REPLACED AGAIN. I'VE BEEN LUCKILY SO FAR BECAUSE I KNOW OF THE PROBLEM, BUT I'VE HAD A FEW CLOSE CALLS WITH HITTING CARS IN PARKING LOTS. *TR

Sep 18, 2007

SPEED SENSORS FAILING ON MY 1997 CHEVROLET TAHOE. *TR

Mileage: 140,000

Feb 11, 2007

ABS BRAKES MALFUNCTIONING. ABS COMES ON INTERMITTENTLY EVEN ON DRY PAVEMENT. *NM

Mileage: 52,000

Oct 2, 2006

STARTED NOTICING APPROX. 1 YEAR AGO THAT THE ANTILOCK BRAKES ACTIVATE AT LOW SPEEDS (LESS THAN 10 MPH) WHEN IT SHOULDN'T (IE: DRY CONDITIONS, CLEAR ROAD) WHICH MAKES COMING TO A COMPLETE STOP A SCARY AND QUESTIONABLE EVENT. *NM

Mileage: 125,000

Mar 2, 2006

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED AT 10 MPH THE ANTILOCK BRAKES ENGAGE. THERE IS A NHTSA RECALL, # 05V379000, REGARDING THE ANTILOCK BRAKES. THE VEHICLE HAS THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL; HOWEVER IT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO THE YEAR. NO REPAIRS HAVE BEEN MADE.

Mileage: 70,000

Dec 5, 2005

DEAR NHTSA: I AM A SENIOR MECHANICAL ENGINEER AND OWNER OF A 1997 CHEVY TAHOE 4WD VEHICLE. I HAVE OWNED THE VEHICLE SINCE MID-2001. A FEW MONTHS AGO I STARTED TO NOTICE THAT PERIODICALLY, THE BRAKES WOULD NOT WORK PROPERLY WHEN PULLING TO A STOP. I CAN HEAR AND FEEL THE ABS SYSTEM PULSING THE BRAKES RAPIDLY, BUT IT PROVIDES EXTREMELY POOR STOPPING ABILITY. I HAVE HAD SEVERAL CLOSE CALLS WITH CARS IN FRONT OF ME, NOT TO MENTION PEDESTRIANS IN CROSSWALKS. THIS IS NOT CORRECT. I AM A FORMER ENGINE DESIGNER AND HAVE WORKED FOR FORD MOTOR COMPANY. I UNDERSTAND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND CAN TELL YOU THIS ISN'T GOOD...OR SAFE. I NOTICED IN THE PAPER THAT THERE IS A KNOWN ISSUE REGARDING GM TRUCK ANTI-LOCK BRAKE SYSTEMS. ADDITIONAL INTERNET RESEARCH CONFIRMED THIS. I AM LOGGING THIS COMPLAINT SO THAT NHTSA IS AWARE OF MY PROBLEM IN THE HOPES THAT GM WILL FIX THE PROBLEM FOR ME. I HAVE NOT TAKEN THE VEHICLE IN FOR REPAIR YET, AS I WAS RESEARCHING TO SEE WHAT COULD BE DONE ABOUT IT. IS NHTSA AWARE OF THE BEST COURSE OF ACTION? I LIVE IN MADISON, WISCONSIN...LAND OF A LOT OF SALT AND METAL CORROSION. PLEASE LET ME KNOW. SINCERELY, TIM HIGGINS. *NM

Mileage: 93,000

Oct 24, 2005

DT: THE CONTACT COMPLAINED ANTI LOCK (ABS) BRAKE SYSTEM. THE ABS WILL ACTIVATE WHILE DRIVING AT SLOW SPEEDS. THE SPEEDS WHEN THE ABS ACTIVATE VARIED FROM 3-10 MPH. THIS HAPPENED UNDER ANY DRIVING CONDITIONS. NO INDICATOR LIGHTS CAME ON TO INDICATE THERE WAS A BRAKE FAILURE. THE DEALERSHIP WAS CALLED AND ASKED HIM TO BRING THE VEHICLE FOR REPAIRS AT CONTACT'S EXPENSE. THERE WAS A RECALL BUT IT DDID NOT INCLUDE THIS VEHICLE. *AK

Mileage: 100,000

Oct 13, 2005

NO ACCIDENT YET. MY 1997 TAHOE IS EXHIBITING THE SAME SYMPTOMS AS DESCRIBED IN THE MEDIA FOR 1999 AND NEWER GM TRUCKS REGARDING THE WHEEL SPEED SENSOR FOR THE ANTILOCK BRAKES. STOPPING FROM SPEEDS UNDER 5 MPH, THE BRAKE PEDAL CHATTERS, THE ANTILOCK BRAKE UNIT MOANS, AND THE TRUCK IS SLOW TO COMPLETELY STOP. THIS STARTED SPORADICALLY LAST WINTER AND HAS GOTTEN WORSE, NOW ABOUT 30% OF THE TIME. I CALLED CHEVROLET'S CUSTOMER SERVICE TODAY (10/13/2005) AT 11:10, SPOKE TO BAGAYA BONNER WHO TOLD ME THE RECALL AFFECTED 2000-2002 TAHOES. MINE WOULD NOT BE INCLUDED, AND IF I HAD THE PROBLEM FIXED, IT WOULD BE AT MY EXPENSE (GM WOULD NOT REIMBURSE SINCE THERE WAS NO RECALL ON MY VEHICLE). I AM USING TODAY'S DATE AS THE INCIDENT DATE, BUT THE PROBLEM BEGAN LATE FALL 2004 AND IS ONGOING. *NM

Mileage: 55,000

Oct 6, 2005

DT: THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKES DO NOT WORK PROPERLY, WHEN GETTING BELOW 10 MPH THE BRAKES SURGE AND INCREASED IN STOPPING DISTANCE. THE CONSUMER COULD HEAR THE BRAKE PEDAL PULSATING. THIS HAPPENS ON DRY ROADS. THIS STARTED HAPPENING ON JULY 1, 2005. IT HAPPENED INTERMITTENTLY, AND NOW IT HAPPEN EVERY TIME WHEN THE CONSUMER COMES TO A STOP. CONTACTED THE DEALER, THEY CHARGED THE CONSUMER TO FIX THE BRAKES. THERE IS A RECALL, BUT ONLY FOR CANADA. *AK *JB

Mileage: 98,000

Sep 30, 2005

DT: THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 CHEVROLET TAHOE. CONTACT COMPLAINED THAT WHILE DRIVING THE ABS BRAKES ACTIVATED. CONTACT DID NOT EVEN HAVE TO BE DRIVING HE COULD JUST PUT IT IN GEAR AND THE BRAKES WILL ACTIVATE. WHEN DRIVING AT SPEEDS LESS THAN 15MPH ABS BRAKES WILL ACTIVATE. NO RECALL CAMPAIGN #. NO CRASHES. NO POLICE REPORTS. NO INJURIES. *AK

Mileage: 65,000

Aug 31, 2005

MY 1997 TAHOE EXHIBITS THE SAME ANTILOCK FAILURES THAT ARE LISTED FOR THE 1999 MODELS FOR NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NO. 05V379000 BUT IT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL. THE SAME IS THE CASE FOR GM RECALL NO. 03023/NHTSA ID NO. 05V37900, THE WINDSHIELD WIPER CIRCUIT BOARD. I HAVE THE SAME FAILURES CONTINUOUSLY IN MY '97 CHEVY TAHOE BUT THE RECALL WAS EXTENDED ONLY TO SUBURBANS. AS A FORMER GM ENGINEER I KNOW THAT THE SAME PARTS AND SUPPLIERS ARE USED ACROSS THE BOARD FOR ALL OF THE GMT 800 SERIES (TAHOES, SUBURBANS, YUKONS, ETC.). SO I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW ONE MODEL CAN BE RECALLED WHEN ESSENCE ALL MODELS SHOULD BE RECALLED. *NM

Aug 30, 2005

MY 1997 CHEVY TAHOE HAD THE SAME PROBLEM WITH ANTI-LOCK BRAKES AS THE BATCH OF TRUCKS IN TODAY'S GM RECALL. THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKES WENT ON WHEN THE CAR WAS AT VERY SLOW SPEED, LIKE PULLING UP TO A STOP LIGHT OR SIGN. I PAID $300 TO A MECHANIC TO CLEAN THE SAME SENSOR IN THE RECALL. WHY DID THE RECALL STOP AT THE 1999 MODEL YEAR? *JB

Mileage: 46,000

Nov 4, 2004

AT SLOW SPEEDS WHEN THE BRAKE IS APPLIED, JUST BEFORE THE VEHICLE IS ABOUT TO STOP,THE BRAKE RELEASES AND THE VEHICLE ROLLS 2-3FEET. BEFORE IT STOPS. IT HAS BEEN A GREAT EXPENSE TO MYSELF REPLACING BRAKE PARTS THAT DID NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM.*AK I RECENTLY FOUND A SERVICE BULLETIN THAT DESCRIBES THIS PROBLEM. I THOUGHT IT SHOULD BE REPAIRED AT GMC EXPENSE FOR A POOR DESIGN BUT THEY DO NOT AGREE. THE VEHICLE IS A 1997 CHEVROLET TAHOE

Mileage: 80,000

Jul 28, 2004

ABS SYSTEM COMES ON AT LOW SPEEDS WITHOUT BRAKE PRESSED-VEHICLE THEN IS HARD TO STOP AND PULLS TO THE RIGHT. I HAVE REPLACED ALL PADS AND CALIPERS.MACHINE BLED SYSTEM AND REPLACED LEFT FRT SPEED SENSOR. TOOK TO DEALER AND WAS TOLD THAT THE FRONT HUBS ARE EXPOSED AND MOST OF THE TIME TEAR APART AND CLEANING SOLVES. AM UPSET THE DEALER CHARGED A DIAGNOSTIC FEE FOR SOMETHING HE COULD HAVE TOLD ME ON THE PHONE!*AK

Mileage: 51,000

Jul 28, 2004

ABS SYSTEM COMES ON AT LOW SPEEDS WITHOUT BRAKE PRESSED-VEHICLE THEN IS HARD TO STOP AND PULLS TO THE RIGHT. I HAVE REPLACED ALL PADS AND CALIPERS.MACHINE BLED SYSTEM AND REPLACED LEFT FRT SPEED SENSOR. TOOK TO DEALER AND WAS TOLD THAT THE FRONT HUBS ARE EXPOSED AND MOST OF THE TIME TEAR APART AND CLEANING SOLVES. AM UPSET THE DEALER CHARGED A DIAGNOSTIC FEE FOR SOMETHING HE COULD HAVE TOLD ME ON THE PHONE!*AK

Mileage: 51,000

Jul 28, 2004

ABS SYSTEM COMES ON AT LOW SPEEDS WITHOUT BRAKE PRESSED-VEHICLE THEN IS HARD TO STOP AND PULLS TO THE RIGHT. I HAVE REPLACED ALL PADS AND CALIPERS.MACHINE BLED SYSTEM AND REPLACED LEFT FRT SPEED SENSOR. TOOK TO DEALER AND WAS TOLD THAT THE FRONT HUBS ARE EXPOSED AND MOST OF THE TIME TEAR APART AND CLEANING SOLVES. AM UPSET THE DEALER CHARGED A DIAGNOSTIC FEE FOR SOMETHING HE COULD HAVE TOLD ME ON THE PHONE!*AK

Mileage: 51,000

Jan 15, 2004

TRANSMISSION STARTED TO SHIFT REAL HARD FROM 1ST TO 2ND AND 2ND TO 3RD GEARS AFTER DRIVING ON HIGHWAY FOR 30 MINUTES. DROVE THIS WAY FOR 3 YEARS. HAD TRANS REBUILT JUNE 2003 AT 68K MILES AND WENT ON ROAD TRIP 900 MILES AND PROBLEMS STARTED WHILE ON MY VACATION TRIP. HAD TO HAVE THE VALVEBODY REPLACED AT THE COST OF $400 WHILE ON VACATION. I WAS TOLD THAT WAS WHY MY TRANSMISSION BURNED UP TIME. BRAKES STARTED WHEN THE DEALER REPLACED A LEAKING MASTER CYLINDER. I BROUGHT IT BACK FOR A SPONGY / LOW PEDAL AND WAS TOLD THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG AND THERE WAS NOTHING GM WOULD DO ABOUT IT. STILL STUCK WITH SPONGY / LOW PEDAL

Mileage: 38,000

Jan 19, 2003

ROTORS WARPING WITH NORMAL USE EVERY 3000-4000 MILES. HAD TO REDO FRONT BRAKES 5 TIMES IN 20,000 MILES. REPLACED ROTORS, PADS, CALIPERS, BRAKE HOSE, ROTORS TURNED AND STILL HAVE PROBLEMS.

Mileage: 78,260

Jan 19, 2003

ROTORS WARPING WITH NORMAL USE EVERY 3000-4000 MILES. HAD TO REDO FRONT BRAKES 5 TIMES IN 20,000 MILES. REPLACED ROTORS, PADS, CALIPERS, BRAKE HOSE, ROTORS TURNED AND STILL HAVE PROBLEMS.

Mileage: 78,260

Nov 20, 2002

CAME TO INTERSECTION AT ABOUT 30 MPH AND BRAKES FAILED TO EVEN SLOW THE VEHICLE WHEN DEPRESSED. THE PEDAL WAS AS FIRM AS ALWAYS, BUT IT WAS AS IF THERE WERE NO DRUMS OR DISCS ON THE WHEELS. MY WIFE HAD A SIMILAR SITUATION A FEW DAYS EARLIER AND I THOUGHT SHE HAD JUST HAD THE ABS WORKING AND WASN'T USED TO IT. THERE WAS NO ABS PULSING. DT

Sep 18, 2002

WHILE DRIVING 25MPH BRAKES FAILED, CAUSING A NEAR ACCIDENT.*AK

Aug 6, 2002

BRAKES ARE NOT WORKING CORRECTLY WHEN DRIVING AND TRYING TO APPLY THE BRAKES.CONSUMER WILL PUSH BRAKES ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR BEFORE THE VEHICLE COMES TO A STOP. CONTACTED DEALER, AND THE DEALER CANNOT FIND CAUSE OF PROBLEM.*AK

Jul 20, 2002

BRAKE FAILURE. *AK

Apr 15, 2002

CONSUMER STATES THAT THE BRAKE MAKES A LOUD NOISE ON HARD STOPS AND THERE IS EXTENDED BRAKING AT SPEEDS OVER 40 MPH, BRAKES HAVE BEEN REPLACED TWICE IN FOUR YEARS. *YD

Apr 15, 2002

CONSUMER STATES THAT THE BRAKE MAKES A LOUD NOISE ON HARD STOPS AND THERE IS EXTENDED BRAKING AT SPEEDS OVER 40 MPH, BRAKES HAVE BEEN REPLACED TWICE IN FOUR YEARS. *YD

Feb 27, 2002

WHILE DRIVING CONSUMER NOTICED A DIFFERENCE IN THE BRAKE PEDAL WHEN STOPPING AT A LIGHT. THE BRAKE BECAME HARDER TO PUSH AND CONSUMER COULD HEAR A HISSING SOUND, THE REPAIR SHOP REPLACED THE VACUUM POWER BRAKE UNIT.*JG

Feb 27, 2002

WHILE DRIVING CONSUMER NOTICED A DIFFERENCE IN THE BRAKE PEDAL WHEN STOPPING AT A LIGHT. THE BRAKE BECAME HARDER TO PUSH AND CONSUMER COULD HEAR A HISSING SOUND, THE REPAIR SHOP REPLACED THE VACUUM POWER BRAKE UNIT.*JG

Jan 17, 2002

WHILE DRIVING, CONSUMER ATTEMPTED TO BRAKE, INSTEAD THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR, AND THE VEHICLE CRASHED INTO A STORE, CONSUMER STATES THAT THE MASTER CYLINDER, ALTHOUGH FULL OF FLUID, HAD FAILED, THERE WERE NO INJURIES. *TT

Jan 17, 2002

WHILE DRIVING, CONSUMER ATTEMPTED TO BRAKE, INSTEAD THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR, AND THE VEHICLE CRASHED INTO A STORE, CONSUMER STATES THAT THE MASTER CYLINDER, ALTHOUGH FULL OF FLUID, HAD FAILED, THERE WERE NO INJURIES. *TT

Oct 16, 2001

WHEN APPLYING BRAKES IN A SUDDEN STOP, THE BRAKE PEDAL WOULD NOT GO DOWN, IT WOULD REMAIN IN AN UPRIGHT POSITION UNTIL APPLYING BRAKES IN A NORMAL CONDITION. VEHICLE HAS BEEN TO DEALER'S SHOP ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS, AND THE PROBLEM IS STILL REOCCURRING. *AK *YH

Oct 12, 2001

LEFT FRONT BRAKE ROTOR SEPARATED. THAT IS TO SAY, THE DISC ACTUALLY SEPARATED FROM THE HUB. THE SEPARATION CAUSED LOSS OF BRAKING ON THAT WHEEL. THE VEHICLE PULLS HARD TOWARD THE RIGHT(BECAUSE OF THE REMAINING ACTIVE BRAKE). CONCERNS: AN INEXPERIENCED DRIVER MAY HAVE ROLLED THE VEHICLE WITH THE SUDDEN HARD PULL TO THE RIGHT; HAD BOTH ROTORS FAILED AT THE SAME TIME, A COMPLETE LOSS OF FRONT BRAKES WOULD HAVE BEEN THE RESULT. I HAVE THE FAILED PART. THE REPAIR SHOP WHO FIXED THE VEHICLE TOLD ME THEY SEE THIS KIND OF FAILURE ON A REGULAR BASIS. THUS TYPE OF COMPOSITE ROTOR IS COMMON ON MANY GM VEHICLES. HAVING EXPERIENCED THE FAILURE, I CAN'T HELP BUT WONDER IF CRASHES MAY HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THE ROTOR FAILURE, BUT THE "BROKEN" ROTOR COULD HAVE BEEN ASSUMED TO BE A RESULT OF THE CRASH? I HAVE NOT CONTACTED GM AT THIS POINT. I HAVE SEVERAL COMPLAINTS CONCERNING THIS VEHICLE I AM ATTEMPTING TO ADDRESS WITH GM, BUT FOR THE MOST PART AM BEING TOLD THE VEHICLE IS OUT OF WARRANTY. THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE THAT I FELT NHTSA SHOULD BE AWARE OF, AND WILL, HOPEFULLY, LOOK INTO. THANK YOU, AND I HOPE TO HEAR FROM YOU SOON.*AK *TR

Jul 25, 2001

WHEN BACKING OUT OF THE GARAGE THE BRAKES FAILED. HAD I NOT REALLY PRESSED ON THE BRAKES EXTREMELY HARD I WOULD HAVE HIT THE MOTOR HOME THAT WAS ACROSS THE STREET FROM MY DRIVEWAY. I STOPPED ABOUT 5 INCHES FROM IT. I HATE TO THINK WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF THIS HAD OCCURED WHILE I WAS ON THE FREEWAY AND MAKING AN EMERGENCY STOP. THIS COMPONENT FAILED WITHOUT ANY NOTICE. IT SHOULD NOT HAVE FAILED AT SUCH AN EARLY AGE AND IS OBVIOUSLY A DEFECT. I CALLED THE LOCAL DEALER , AND HE TOLD ME THAT THERE WAS NO SERVICE BULLETIN ON THE ISSUE, AND THAT I WOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR IT SINCE IT WAS OUT OF WARRANTY, SO I TOOK IT TO A LOCAL SHOP INSTEAD OF THE DEALER. THE CHEVY DEALER HAD THE NERVE TO TELL ME THAT IT WOULD BE ABOUT $500 TO REPLACE THE BOOSTER, AND THEY WOULD GIVE ME NO ASSURANCES THAT THE REPLACEMENT WOULD NOT FAIL IN THE SAME MANNER! *AK

Apr 19, 2001

THERE WAS BAD VIBRATION WHEN PUTTING ON BRAKES, TRUCK WOULD SHAKE. THEN, PEDAL SEEMED TO GO TO FLOOR. TOOK TO CHEVROLET 7 TIMES TO HAVE DIFFERENT PARTS REPLACED FOR BRAKES. CONSUMER STATED THAT A MONTH AGO BRAKES HAD JUST BEEN SERVICED, AND ON YESTERDAY BRAKES LOCKED UP. *AK

Feb 13, 2001

ROTORS REPLACED,TURNED FREQUENTLY. REPAIR FACILITY SAYS THIS FREQUENTLY HAPPENS WITH GM CARS. IS THERE A SOLUTION?IS THIS DANGEROUS? THE VEHICLE VIBRATES IN THE FRONT END WHEN THE BRAKES ARE APPLIED UNLESS ROTORS ARE NEW OR JUST TURNED.

Feb 7, 2001

STEERING WAS LIKE ON ICE, HAD TO REPLACE STEERING SENSOR, FRONT DISC ROTORS WARPED TWICE, HAD TO REPLACE. *AK

Feb 7, 2001

WHILE BACKING OUT OF DRIVEWAY, APPLIED THE BRAKES, BUT VEHICLE FAILED TO STOP, ABS SYSTEM CAME ON PROHIBITING THE VEHICLE FROM STOPPING FOR SOME DISTANCE EVEN THOUGH CONDITIONS WERE DRY, VEHICLE TAKEN TO DEALERSHIP, DEALER AWARE OF PROBLEM, OWNER PAID FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF TWO FRONT HUBS AND WOULD LIKE TO BE REIMIBURSED. CJ

Jan 30, 2001

REPEATED ROTOR AND PAD WARPING AND PREMATURE WEAR. EVERY 3-4,000 MILES. *AK

Jan 30, 2001

REPEATED ROTOR AND PAD WARPING AND PREMATURE WEAR. EVERY 3-4,000 MILES. *AK

Jan 4, 2001

MY TAHOE HAS WARPED THE FRONT ROTORS UNDER NORMAL USE(NO TOWING) UNDER WARRANTY 6 TIMES AND TWICE MORE OUT OF WARRANTY WITH ONLY 38K MILES TOTAL. CHEVEROLT DEALER CLAIMS THERE ARE NO TECHNICAL BULLITENS ON THIS PROBLEM EVEN THOUGH I'VE LEARNED THE SUBURBAN HAS A SIMILAR ISSUE REQUIRING A PROPORTIONING VALVE REPLACEMENT. ON AVERAGE THIS TAHOE HAS WARPED THE FRONT ROTORS EVERY 4000 MILES. WHAT CAN BE DONE TO RESOLVE THIS ISSUE?*AK

Jan 4, 2001

MY TAHOE HAS WARPED THE FRONT ROTORS UNDER NORMAL USE(NO TOWING) UNDER WARRANTY 6 TIMES AND TWICE MORE OUT OF WARRANTY WITH ONLY 38K MILES TOTAL. CHEVEROLT DEALER CLAIMS THERE ARE NO TECHNICAL BULLITENS ON THIS PROBLEM EVEN THOUGH I'VE LEARNED THE SUBURBAN HAS A SIMILAR ISSUE REQUIRING A PROPORTIONING VALVE REPLACEMENT. ON AVERAGE THIS TAHOE HAS WARPED THE FRONT ROTORS EVERY 4000 MILES. WHAT CAN BE DONE TO RESOLVE THIS ISSUE?*AK

Dec 5, 2000

ABS ENGAGES INTERMITTENTLY, DEALER REPAIRED VEHICLE AT CONSUMER'S COST AND ALSO INFORMED CONSUMER THAT THE VEHICLE WAS NOT COVERED UNDER MANUFACTURER'S RECALL, FRONT HUBS AND SENSOR WERE REPLACED. *SLC

Nov 29, 2000

CONSUMER TOOK VEHICLE TO DEALER FOR A BRAKE JOB, AND THE ATTENDANT REPLACED BRAKES. *AK

Nov 1, 2000

POWER BRAKE BOOSTER IS LEAKING VACCUM CAUSING THE BRAKE PEDAL TO BE HARD, REPLACED THE POWER BRAKE BOOSTER. *SLC

Oct 30, 2000

WHILE DRIVING ABOUT 65 MPH DOWN THE MOUNTAIN WHEN APPLYING BRAKE PEDAL VEHICLE DID NOT STOP. CONSUMER HAD TO PLACE VEHICLE LOW GEAR TO REDUCE SPEED, THEN IT STOPPED. *AK

Oct 19, 2000 Crash

VEHICLE WILL NOT STOP HAD 2 REAR-END COLLISIONS WITHIN 3 MONTHS

Oct 4, 2000

BRAKE PEDAL GOES TO FLOOR WHEN BRAKING HARD, VEHICLE DOES NOT STOP. COMPLAINED TO TWO DIFFERENT DEALERS BUT THEY SAY THAT THE BRAKES ARE OK

Sep 14, 2000

ABS BRAKING SYSTEM IS DEFECTIVE. BUT, REGULAR BRAKES DO WORK. BUT WHEN TRAVELING IN SNOW OR ICE ABS BRAKING SYSTEM TAKES LONGER TO STOP. DEALERSHIP IS AWARE OF THE PROBLEM.*AK

Sep 1, 2000

WHILE DRIVING COULD SWITCH LANES WITH OVERSENSITIVE POWER STEERING, CONSUMER BELIEVED THAT POWERING STEERING PUMP AND BRAKES BOOSTER FAILE D AT 43000 MILES. *AK

Aug 23, 2000

THE ABS SYSTEM WOULD KICK IN FOR NO REASON AND DIDN'T MATTER WHAT THE ROAD SURFACE WAS. THE VEHICLE WOULD PULL EXCESIVELY TO THE CROWN OF THE ROAD, IF YOU TOOK YOUR HANDS OFF THE STERRING WHEEL, YOU WOULD END UP IN A DITCH IN LESS THAN TWO SECONDS. THE CRUISE CONTROL WOULD WORK WHEN IT WANTED TO, SAME AS THE HORN. THE BRAKES WOULD PULSATE. IT WENT THROUGH ONE OF THE FRONT PADS EVERY TEN THOUSAND MILES; THE OTHER THREE PADSHAD OVER 50% LEFT. THE TRANSMISSION WOULD SHIFT WAY TO EARLY FROM FIRST TO SECOND; CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO ALOMOST QUIT ACCELERATING BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF POWER.

Aug 23, 2000

THE TURN SIGNALS QUIT WORKING AT THE DEALER AND THEY NEVER DID PIN-POINT IT. THE 4WD SYSTEM ENGAGED ON IT'S OWN AT 75 MPH AND THE TRANS, CUT OUT RESULTING IN NO POWER AND THEN IT RETURNED BUT THE 4WD SYSTEM WAS GONE. THE BARKES FAILED AND THEN STARTED WORKING OK. THE PARKING BRAKE WAS IN NEED OF ADJUSTMENT EVERY 2000 MILES. THE ABS WOULD KICK IN FOR NO REASON.

Jul 18, 2000 Crash

ABS BRAKE SYSTEMS DOES NOT WORK, WHEN APPLIED THE BRAKES AT 30-40MPG THE BRAKES WILL NOT STOP VEHICLE, EXPERIENCE ACCIDENTS OVER A 2 YEAR PERIOD. HIT TWO CARS DUE TO FAILURE.

Jun 29, 2000

NO SUMMARY LISTED FOR ABOVE VEHICLE. *AK

Jun 23, 2000

ANOTHER VEHICLE CUT IN QUICKLY IN FRONT OF CONSUMER'S VEHICLE. CONSUMER APPLIED BRAKES (ABS) & HEARD HISSING NOISES, LIKE RELEASING OF AIR, BEFORE VEHICLE STOPPED. TOOK VEHICLE TO DEALER & MECHANIC INDICATED POWER ASSIST MODULE'S RUBBER DIAPHRAGM WAS BADLY DAMAGED. IT NEEDED TO BE REPLACED.*AK

Jun 23, 2000

ANOTHER VEHICLE CUT IN QUICKLY IN FRONT OF CONSUMER'S VEHICLE. CONSUMER APPLIED BRAKES (ABS) & HEARD HISSING NOISES, LIKE RELEASING OF AIR, BEFORE VEHICLE STOPPED. TOOK VEHICLE TO DEALER & MECHANIC INDICATED POWER ASSIST MODULE'S RUBBER DIAPHRAGM WAS BADLY DAMAGED. IT NEEDED TO BE REPLACED.*AK

May 25, 2000

ONGOING PROBLEM WITH EXCESSIVE WEAR OF BRAKE PADS. REPLACEMENT NEEDED EVERY TWO -THREE MONTHS. DEALER NOTIFIED, AND INFORMED CONSUMER THAT BRAKE ROTORS ALSO NEEDED REPLACEMENT, AND IT WOULD ONLY BE DONE AT CONSUMER'S EXPENSE BECAUSE PARTS WERE NOT UNDER A MANUFACTURER'S RECALL. FEEL FREE TO PROVIDE FURTHER DETAILS. *AK

May 25, 2000

ONGOING PROBLEM WITH EXCESSIVE WEAR OF BRAKE PADS. REPLACEMENT NEEDED EVERY TWO -THREE MONTHS. DEALER NOTIFIED, AND INFORMED CONSUMER THAT BRAKE ROTORS ALSO NEEDED REPLACEMENT, AND IT WOULD ONLY BE DONE AT CONSUMER'S EXPENSE BECAUSE PARTS WERE NOT UNDER A MANUFACTURER'S RECALL. FEEL FREE TO PROVIDE FURTHER DETAILS. *AK

Apr 28, 2000

4-WHEEL DRIVE: ON DRY CONDITIONS AND AT SLOW SPEEDS, ABS BRAKING SYSTEM ACTIVATED, CAUSING EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE WHICH MAY RESULT IN A CRASH. DEALER SAID THE PROBLEM WAS DUE TO THE FRONT HUBS WEARING OUT WHICH CAUSED THE ABS BRAKES TO MALFUNCTION. *AK

Mar 6, 2000

REAR BRAKE WHEEL CYLINDER WAS TOTALLY DEFECTIVE. BRAKE FLUID WAS COMING OUT OF THE DETERIORATED CAPS ON WHEEL CYLINDER, DAMAGING THE REAR AXLE SEALS. CONSUMER WANTS REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE REAR BRAKE WORK DONE. *AK *ML

Feb 13, 2000

NO SUMMARY LISTED FOR ABOVE VEHICLE. *AK( DOT NUMBER: TIRE SIZE: 265/75/R16 )

Jan 30, 2000

CALIPER SLIDES FROZE DUE TO TOLERANCE/COROSSION, CAUSING VEHICLE TO EFFECTIVELY UTILIZE ONE BRAKE PAD FOR BRAKING. DEALER NOTED THAT THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM AND OFFERED TO CHARGE ME FOR FILING (SERVICE BULLETIN # 99-05-24-001) DOWN THE CALIPER SLIDE TO BE WITHIN TOLERANCE (NOT COVERED UNDER "BUMPER TO BUMPER" WARRANTY - CHEVROLET CUSTOMER SERVICE FILE #000014560). ACCORDING TO NAPA BRAKE INSTALLATION ISTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICABLE PADS (GM PART NUMBERS 7024A OR 7081A), THERE IS A POSSSIBILITY OF THIS CONDITION BREAKING CONTACT BETWEEN THE PAD FRICTION MATERIAL AND THE METAL BACKING, WHICH WOULD SEVERELY HAMPER OR REMOVE ALL BRAKING POWER FROM THAT WHEEL. I HAVE A BROTHER WITH A CHEVY ASTRO VAN OF SIMILAR YEAR, AND AN UNCLE WITH A FULL SIZE CHEVY TRUCK OF SIMILAR YEAR, BOTH OF WHOM HAVE EXPERIENCED FRONT BRAKE EXCESSIVE/UNEVEN WEAR. THIER VEHICLES WERE OUT OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD AT THE TIME IT WAS NOTICED. I FEEL THAT CHEVY HAS DENIED ME A WARRANTY CLAIM, BECAUSE THIS IS AN INHERENT PROBLEM WITH THIER BRAKE DESIGN, AND WOULD BE TOO COSTLY TO RECALL. I ALSO FEEL THAT BECAUSE IT INVOLVES THE FRONT BRAKES (WHICH PROVIDE MOST OF BRAKING POWER) OF MANY LARGE VEHICLES, THAT MANY USE FOR TOWING, THIS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR A SAFETY RECALL, OR AT LEAST COVERED UNDER WARRANY, IF DISCOVERED UNDER WARRANTY PERIOD. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. *AK

Jan 11, 2000 Crash

I HAVE BEEN INVOLVED / RESPONSIBLE FOR 2 REAR END COLLISIONS THAT HAVE OCCURRED AS A RESULT OF MY ABS SYSTEM NOT STOPPING MY VEHICLE. THE FIRST TIME THIS HAPPENED I FELT THAT THE BRAKES DID NOT OPERATE CORRECTLY, BUT CONTINUED TO OPERATE THE VEHICLE. JUST LAST WEEK I WAS INVOLVED IN AN ACCIDENT AT LOW SPEED WITH MORE THAN SUFFICIENT STOPPING DISTANCE AND THE VEHICLE SLID INTO THE REAR OF OTHER. I HAVE NOT HAD ANY ACCIDENTS IN OVER 20 YEARS WITH MULTIPLE VEHICLES AND TO HAVE TWO SIMILIAR ACCIDENTS WITHIN A YEAR OF EACH OTHER FOR THE SAME CAUSE LEADS ME TO SUSPECT SOMETHING IS WRONG. HAVE THERE BEEN OTHER COMPLIANTS REGARDING THE ABS CAPABILITY IN CHEVY TRUCKS? *AK

Jan 7, 2000

ABS SYSTEM FAILED AT 55097 MILES,IT SHOULD BE UNDER WARRANTY. *AK

Dec 20, 1999

INTERMITTENTLY WHEN THE BRAKES ARE APPLIED THE PEDAL GOES PARTIALLY TO THE FLOOR, RESULTING IN EXTENDED STOPPING . DEALER HAS BEEN NOTIFIED. *AK

Dec 1, 1999

3RD SET OF BRAKES IN 29,000 MILES. TOTAL BRAKE FAILURE, CLOSE CALL TO HITTING CAR IN FRONT OF ME. COULD NOT STOP, BRAKE PEDAL ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR. GM & DEALERSHIP HAVE BEEN NO ASSISTANCE IN GETTING PROBLEM RESOLVED.

Nov 30, 1999

AT 13000 MILES POOR BRAKING AND NOISE IN FRONT END. DEALER CHECKS BRAKES FINDS THAT SPECS ARE MET.29000 MI. BRAKES ARE SHOT AND REPLACED AT MY EXPENSE. GM SAYS DEALER MUST HAVE MISDIAGNOSED TAKE IT UP WITH THEM EVEN THOUGH HISTORICAL DATA SHOWS PROBLEM REPORTED AT 13000 MILES.IT ISN'T RIGHT THAT SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH IS THE WAKE CALL THAT ONE OF THE USA'S LARGEST CORPORATIONS NEEDS TO STEP-UP TO ACCEPTING RESPONSIBILITY FOR A PRODUCT THEY ENGINEERED,DESIGNED, AND MARKETED. I WOULD EXPECT THAT FROM CHINA. *AK

Nov 10, 1999 Crash

CHEV STEADFASTLY HAS FOUND NO PROBLEM; VEHICLE, HOWEVER, SAILS ON...

Nov 4, 1999

POOR DESIGN OF RUBBER COVER ON THE BRAKE PEDAL CAME OFF CAUSING DRIVER'S FOOT TO SLIP TO THE FLOOR RESULTING IN A REAR END COLLISION. *YC

Nov 1, 1999

WHEN THE BRAKES ARE APPLIED PEDAL GOES PARTIALLY TO THE FLOOR AND THE VEHICLE VIBRATES. THE DEALER HAS INSPECTED THE VEHICLE SEVERAL TIMES, AND THE AND THE PROBLEM STILL EXISTS. MANUFACTURER HAS BEEN NOTIFIED. *AK

Sep 23, 1999

FRONT BRAKE COMPONENTS AND U-JOINTS FAILED AT LESS THAN 50,000 MILES

Sep 23, 1999

FRONT BRAKE COMPONENTS AND U-JOINTS FAILED AT LESS THAN 50,000 MILES

Aug 24, 1999

FRONT DISC BRAKES DO NOT FUNCTION PROPERLY. I BOUGHT THIS VEHICLE IN MAY 1997. APPROXIMATELY 6 MONTHS AFTER DRIVING THIS VEHICLE I STARTED NOTICING FRONT DISC BRAKE PROBLEMS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO GUNDERSON CHEVROLET WERE THEY "GRINDED" AND LUBED FRONT "KNUCKLES?" . PROBLEM CONTINUED AND CONSISITS OF "JERKY" AND "CLUNKY" FRONT BRAKES. VEHICLE HAS BEEN TAKEN TO A PRIVATE REPAIR SHOP WERE FRONT DISC PADS WERE REPLACED AND FRONT ROTOR WERE TURNED DUE TO WARPING. VEHICLE CONTINUES TO EXHIBIT A "JERKY" BRAKING MOTION WHICH IS ANNOYING AND COULD POSSIBLY CAUSE AN ACCIDENT DUE TO IMPROPER BRAKING. I BELIEVE THAT THIS FRONT BRAKE SYSTEM IS VERY POORLY DESIGNED AND WOULD EXPECT THAT GMAC SHOULD REPAIR THIS $35,000 VEHICLE WHICH SHOULD HAVE A RELIABLE AND SMOOTH FRONT BRAKING SYSTEM.( DOT NUMBER: TIRE SIZE: 235/75/15 )

Aug 23, 1999

WHILE DRIVING AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS AROUND 50 TO 60 MPH VEHICLE WANDERS AND DRIFTS TO LEFT OR RIGHT. DEALER HAS BEEN CONTACTED. BRAKES DO NOT FUNCTION PROPERLY; EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE. BRAKES HAVE BEEN REPLACED TWICE. *AK *ML

Aug 4, 1999 Crash

WHILE DRIVING AT ANY SPEED AND GOING OVER RAILROAD TRACKS AND ROUGH ROADS AND GRAVEL, VEHICLE DIDN'T STOP, CAUSING CONSUMER TO REAR END ANOTHER VEHICLE. *AK

Aug 3, 1999

WHEN APPLYING THE BRAKES, DURING A NORMAL STOP, THE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR AND THE TRUCK DID NOT STOP. DRIVER USED BOTH FEET TO STOP THE TRUCK AFTER DRIVING ONTO THE SHOULDER. DEALER HAS BEEN NOTIFIED ABOUT THIS PROBLEM. 6 SETS OF BRAKES HAVE BEEN PUT ON THIS VEHICLE IN 2 YEARS. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURTHER DETAILS. *AK

Jul 26, 1999 Crash

CONSUMER WAS TRAVELING AT 15 MPH AND APPLYING THE BRAKES, ABS KICKED IN AND THE CONSUMER REAR ENDED THE OTHER VEHICLE. *AK

Jul 22, 1999

INTERMITTENTLY WHEN BRAKES ARE APPLIED THE PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR, RESULTING IN EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE. THE DEALER HAS REPAIRED THE VEHICLE SEVERAL TIMES. *AK

Jul 11, 1999

MAJOR CLUNK AND VIBRATION AFTER BRAKING TO A STOP

Jul 8, 1999

STEERING AND FRONT SUPENSION GETTING VERY LOOSE .DEALER SAYS NORMAL BUT IS NOT

Jul 8, 1999

STEERING GETS LOOSE WHEN WARM, MAYBE SOMTHING WRONG WITH VARIABLE ASSIT SYSTEM, CAN CAUSE DANGEROUS LANE CHANGES. *AK

Jun 3, 1999

VEHICLE EXPERIENCING ONGOING PROBLEM WITH BOTH FRONT ROTORS OVERHEATING, AND CAUSING ROTORS TO WARP. DEALER/MANUFACTURER NOTIFIED. *AK

May 9, 1999

DEALER REPORTED THAT MASTER CYLINDER FAILED, HAD TO REPLACE ALONG WITH FRONT BRAKE SHOES AND PADS, ROTORS TURNED. WE WERE CHARGED FOR ALL THIS, DEALER CHARGED THAT IT WAS NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR. WE HAVE FOUND NUMEROUS OTHER PEOPLE WHO HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SAME PROBLEM. THINK THAT MASTER CYLINDER IS A DEFECTIVE PART..UNFAIR TO CHARGE OWNERS FOR THIS...COULD LEAD TO SERIOUS CRASHES, MINE FAILED WITHOUT WARNING! *AK

May 9, 1999

DEALER REPORTED THAT MASTER CYLINDER FAILED, HAD TO REPLACE ALONG WITH FRONT BRAKE SHOES AND PADS, ROTORS TURNED. WE WERE CHARGED FOR ALL THIS, DEALER CHARGED THAT IT WAS NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR. WE HAVE FOUND NUMEROUS OTHER PEOPLE WHO HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SAME PROBLEM. THINK THAT MASTER CYLINDER IS A DEFECTIVE PART..UNFAIR TO CHARGE OWNERS FOR THIS...COULD LEAD TO SERIOUS CRASHES, MINE FAILED WITHOUT WARNING! *AK

Mar 29, 1999 Crash

WHEN APPLYING ABS BRAKES ON DRY PAVEMENT, THEY LOCKED UP, CAUSING EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE, SND RESULTING IN A COLLISION. PLEASE GIVE ANY FURTHER DETAILS. *AK

Mar 27, 1999

MY STEERING HAS LOCKED ON ME WHILE DRIVING, MY CAR WOULD NOT START DUE TO CRACK IN THE BATTERY AND ACID LEAK, MY CAR HAD TO BE TOWED TO REPAIR SHOP DUE TO STARTER CABLE POPPING OFF. CURRENTLY, I AM STRANDED DUE TO MY BRAKES LOSING POWER SOMEHOW. *AK

Feb 9, 1999

ABS BRAKES; WHEN APPLYING BRAKES IN WET WEATHER, PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR AND BRAKES FAILED TO STOP THE VEHICLE. *AK

Feb 1, 1999

REAR DRUMS ON BOTH WHEELS MALFUNCTIONED, BOTH WHERE REPLACED BY DEALER, DRUMS WHERE OUT-OF-ROUND. *YC

Feb 1, 1999

VIBRATION EXPERIENCED WHEN APPLYING BRAKES, CAUSED BY WARPED DISCS. *YC

Feb 1, 1999

FRONT & REAR BRAKE PADS FAILED FOUR TIMES. *YC

Feb 1, 1999

BRAKES ARE CONSISTANTLY INADEQUATE DUE TO ABS SYSTEM. YH

Feb 1, 1999

FRONT BRAKE PADS WORE OUT CAUSING DAMAGE TO ROTORS. YH

Jan 28, 1999

ROTORS FAILED CAUSING VIBRATION.

Jan 24, 1999

I AM CONSTANTLY HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THE BRAKING SYSTEM ON MY TAHOE. I HAVE HAD A SCRAPING SOUND WHEN I FIRST START OUT IN THE MORNING, AND ALSO A SHAKE WHEN BRAKING, I HAVE TAKEN IT TO THE DEALER WHERE I BOUGHT IT TWO TIMES, AND HE HAS REPLACED THE PADS, AND THEN THE DRUMS AND ROTORS. HE SAID THAT THE FACTORY ROTORS WERE NO GOOD BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T BE TURNED SO HE INSTALLED AFTER MARKET ROTORS AND DRUMS.THE SECOND TIME. THE BRAKES WORKED FINE FOR A COUPLE OF WEEKS AND THEN BEGUN DOING THE SAME THING AGAIN. *AK

Jan 24, 1999

I AM CONSTANTLY HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THE BRAKING SYSTEM ON MY TAHOE. I HAVE HAD A SCRAPING SOUND WHEN I FIRST START OUT IN THE MORNING, AND ALSO A SHAKE WHEN BRAKING, I HAVE TAKEN IT TO THE DEALER WHERE I BOUGHT IT TWO TIMES, AND HE HAS REPLACED THE PADS, AND THEN THE DRUMS AND ROTORS. HE SAID THAT THE FACTORY ROTORS WERE NO GOOD BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T BE TURNED SO HE INSTALLED AFTER MARKET ROTORS AND DRUMS.THE SECOND TIME. THE BRAKES WORKED FINE FOR A COUPLE OF WEEKS AND THEN BEGUN DOING THE SAME THING AGAIN. *AK

Jan 24, 1999

I AM CONSTANTLY HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THE BRAKING SYSTEM ON MY TAHOE. I HAVE HAD A SCRAPING SOUND WHEN I FIRST START OUT IN THE MORNING, AND ALSO A SHAKE WHEN BRAKING, I HAVE TAKEN IT TO THE DEALER WHERE I BOUGHT IT TWO TIMES, AND HE HAS REPLACED THE PADS, AND THEN THE DRUMS AND ROTORS. HE SAID THAT THE FACTORY ROTORS WERE NO GOOD BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T BE TURNED SO HE INSTALLED AFTER MARKET ROTORS AND DRUMS.THE SECOND TIME. THE BRAKES WORKED FINE FOR A COUPLE OF WEEKS AND THEN BEGUN DOING THE SAME THING AGAIN. *AK

Nov 18, 1998

FRONT BRAKE ROTORS ARE WARPED, CAUSING THE BRAKE PADS TO WEAR DOWN QUICKLY, AND WHEN BRAKES ARE APPLIED THE VEHICLE VIBRATES AND SHAKES . DEALER HAS BEEN CONTACTED. *AK

Nov 17, 1998

THE CONSUMER HAS BEEN EXPERIENCING PROBLEMS WITH ANTI-LOCK BRAKES. WHE APPLIED BRAKES, THEY WENT TO THE FLOORBOARD. IT WAS HARD FOR THE CONSUMER TO STOP VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER HAS BEEN CONTACTED. *AK

Jul 22, 1998

WHILE DRIVING VEHICLE ABOUT 35 MPH AND WHEN STEPPING ON THE BRAKE PEDAL TO STOP VEHICLE, THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR. ALSO, WHEN RAINING CONSUMER HAS TROUBLE STOPPING AND LOSES CONTROL OF VEHICLE SOMETIMES.AKCONSUMER STATED FRONT AND BACK BRAKES WERE REPLACED TWICE.*JB

Jul 17, 1998

ABS BRAKES LOCK UP WHEN MAKING A RIGHT TURN. ALSO REPLACED RING AND PINION GEAR AND FRONT DRIVE AXLE.

Jun 25, 1998

BRAKE FAILED WHILE DRIVING AT 45 MPH CAUSING THE DRIVER TO RUN A STOP LIGHT.

Apr 17, 1998 Crash

ABS BRAKES DO NOT WORK PROPERLY, CAUSING EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE, RESULTING IN A REAR END COLLISION . *AK

Apr 3, 1998

WHEN BRAKES ARE APPLIED THE PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR, RESULTING IN EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE. VEHICLE HAS BEEN INTO THE DEALER 4 TIMES FOR THIS PROBLEM. *AK

Mar 12, 1998

WHEN TAKING TRUCK IN FOR SERVICE WITH 20,000 THE BRAKE PADS WERE SHOT AND HAD TO BE REPLACED. *AK

Mar 5, 1998

ABS BRAKES LOCKED UP DURING A 25-30 MPH PANIC STOP. *AK

Jan 18, 1998

ANTI-LOCK BRAKE SYSTEM LOCKED.

Jan 13, 1998

VEHICLE HAS BEEN SERVICED FIVE TIMES FOR PROBLEMS WITH BRAKES PULLING TO THE LEFT OR RIGHT.

Dec 22, 1997

THE DRIVER'S SIDE SEATBACK BENDS TO THE RIGHT, CAUSING THE SEAT TO BE IN A COCKED POSITION. THE DEALER HAS REPLACED THE SEAT TWICE PRIOR TO THIS. ALSO REPLACED LEAKING MASTER CYLINDER/LEAKING POWER STEERING PUMP. *AK

Dec 5, 1997

WHEN SLOWING DOWN THE BRAKES WILL NOT ENGAGE. WHEN BRAKES DO ENGAGE THEY LOCK UP. THE DEALER HAS BEEN NOTIFIED. *AK

Oct 29, 1997

DEROGATE PRESSURE DEVELOPED IN BRAKING SYSTEM (ON DAMP RAINY DAY.) PROBABLE CAUSE: TOTAL LOSS OF APPARATUS . POTENETIAL RESULT: CRASH. *AK

Oct 23, 1997

EA94-038; UPON DEPRESSING THE BRAKE PEDAL IN ANY TYPE OF WEATHER CONDITIONS THE VEHICLE BECOMES VERY DIFFICULT TO STOP. THE BRAKE PEDAL GETS VERY SOFT, RESULTING IN BRAKE FADE AWAY, CAUSING EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE. CONSUMER HAS CONTACTED THE DEALER, DEALER STATES THERE IS AIR IN THE MASTER CYLINDER. PLEASE PROVIDE FUTHER DETAILS. *AK

Sep 2, 1997

OWNER HAS 4-WHEEL ABS BRAKES, HAS DIFFICULTY IN BRAKING, THERE SEEMS TO BE EXCESSIVE PLAY IN BRAKES, PEDAL MUST BE PRESSED 2-3 INCHES BEFORE BRAKES RESPOND. ALSO PASSENGERS SIDE SEAT BELT HAS PROBLEMS RETRACTING. *AK *JB

Aug 8, 1997

BRAKE PADS NEED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO CONTAMINATION OF CHASSIS FLUID.

Jul 25, 1997 Crash

WHILE DRIVING VEHICLE THE COMSUMER TRIED TO STOP VEHICLE, BUT THE BRAKES DIDN'T RESPOND AND HAD AN ACCIDENT, REARENDING TWO OTHER VEHICLES. THE DEALER CHECKED EVERYTHING OUT. ACCORDING TO MECHANIC DIDN'T BLEED THE BRAKES; THE MANUFACTURER SAID THEY WILL INVESTIGATE. *AK

Jun 24, 1997

WHEN TRAVELING OVER 30 MPH AND UPON DEPRESSING THE BRAKE PEDAL, THE BRAKES PULSATE, RESULTING IN EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE. CONSUMER ALSO NOTED THAT THE PEDAL ALMOST GOES TO THE FLOORBOARD. PROBLEM OCCURS ON WET OR DRY PAVEMENT. CONS *AKUMER HAS CONTACTED THE DEALER. *AK

Apr 15, 1997

UNDER NORMAL BRAKING CONDITIONS WHEN APPLYING THE BRAKES THERE IS A LONG PEDAL TRAVEL, THE PEDAL GOES ALMOST (3) QUARTERS TO THE FLOORBOARD BEFORE BRAKES ENGAGE. DEALER STATED THIS CONDTION IS NORMAL. *AK

Jan 27, 1997 Crash

WHEN APPLYING THE BRAKES, ROAD WAS A LITTLE WET AND THE PEDAL WENT ALL THE WAY DOWN AND THE VEHICLE DID NOT SLOW AT ALL, HIT ANOTHER VEHICLE IN THE REAR. VEHICLE BEING REPAIRED AT DEALERSHIP. *AK