Common Problem Categories
Complaints by Model Year
All Model Years
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2006 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2005 | 28 | 3 | |
| 2004 | 46 | 3 | |
| 2003 | 52 | 3 | |
| 2002 | 54 | 0 | |
| 2001 | 40 | 0 | |
| 2000 | 32 | 0 | |
| 1999 | 58 | 0 |
Mercedes Benz Clk320 Years to Avoid
The 1999 CLK320 had the most complaints, with issues including electrical problems, transmission concerns, and some engine issues. Early production of any generation tends to have teething problems. SRS warning lights and window regulator failures were common.
Best Mercedes Benz Clk320 Years
The 2006 CLK350 represented the refined end of the first-generation CLK with improved electronics and the updated 3.5L V6. If seeking the CLK320 specifically, the 2003-2005 models were most refined.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the CLK320 reliable?
The CLK320 is reasonably reliable for a Mercedes of its era. The M112 V6 is durable, but electrical gremlins and age-related issues are common. Maintenance costs exceed Japanese competitors.
What are common CLK320 problems?
Window regulators, SRS airbag warning lights, cracked intake manifolds, and various electrical issues are frequently reported. The automatic transmission can develop rough shifting with age.
Is the CLK320 fast?
The CLK320 is adequately powered with 215-221 horsepower depending on year. It is not a sports car but provides refined cruising. The CLK55 AMG offers significantly more performance.
What is the difference between CLK320 and CLK350?
The CLK350 replaced the CLK320 in 2006 with the updated 3.5L V6 producing 268 horsepower versus 215. The CLK350 is the better choice if available.
Should I buy a CLK convertible or coupe?
The convertible adds complexity with the power soft top mechanism that can fail expensively. The coupe is simpler to maintain. Both share the same drivetrain reliability.