1991 MERCURY SABLE Service Brakes, Hydraulic Problems

29 complaints about Service Brakes, Hydraulic

29
Complaints
1
Crashes
0
Fires
0
Deaths

High Severity Issue

This component has been associated with crashes, fires, or deaths.

This Problem Across All Years

All Service Brakes, Hydraulic Complaints (29)

Jan 15, 2004

OTHER THAN THE REST OF MY PROBLEMS WITH THE ABOVE MY NEWEST COMPLAINT IS THAT I JUST FOUND OUT THAT DUE TO THE FACT FORD INSTALLED AN ALUMINIM PISTON WHERE THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN A STEEL ONE WHICH IS THE ONLY ONE AVAILABLE NOW SINCE YOU DISCOVERED YOUR PROBLEMS. MY CAR IS IN THE SHOP RIGHT NOW AND I'M BEING TOLD IT WILL COST BETWEEN $1200.00 - $1500.00 TO FIX DUE TO FORD'S POOR DESIGN. THIS IS NOT MY FIRST SABLE WAGON. THE FIRST ONE HAD ALL KINDS OF A/C PROBLEMS AND I'M GETTING TIRED OF PAYING FOR YOUR MISTAKES. MY A/C IS OUT NOW, I REPLACE BRAKE PADS ALL THE TIME.

Apr 22, 2002

CONSUMER STATED THE BRAKES WERE NEVER SATISFACTORY FROM THE DATE OF PURCHASE, CONSUMER COMPLAINED TO THE DEALER BUT WAS ALWAYS TOLD THAT THE BRAKES WERE OK, THE BRAKES WERE PULSATING AND THERE WAS EXCESSIVE DUST ON THE WHEELS, CONSUMER STATED THE DEFECT WAS THE FRONT ROTORS, WHICH WERE EVENTUALLY REPLACED, HOWEVER CONSUMER STATED THE DEALER DID NOT HONOR THE RECALL BEFORE OR AFTER THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED, THE DEALER ALSO CLEANED AND ADJUSTED THE REAR BRAKES.*JB

Apr 22, 2002

CONSUMER STATED THE BRAKES WERE NEVER SATISFACTORY FROM THE DATE OF PURCHASE, CONSUMER COMPLAINED TO THE DEALER BUT WAS ALWAYS TOLD THAT THE BRAKES WERE OK, THE BRAKES WERE PULSATING AND THERE WAS EXCESSIVE DUST ON THE WHEELS, CONSUMER STATED THE DEFECT WAS THE FRONT ROTORS, WHICH WERE EVENTUALLY REPLACED, HOWEVER CONSUMER STATED THE DEALER DID NOT HONOR THE RECALL BEFORE OR AFTER THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED, THE DEALER ALSO CLEANED AND ADJUSTED THE REAR BRAKES.*JB

Apr 22, 2002

CONSUMER STATED THE BRAKES WERE NEVER SATISFACTORY FROM THE DATE OF PURCHASE, CONSUMER COMPLAINED TO THE DEALER BUT WAS ALWAYS TOLD THAT THE BRAKES WERE OK, THE BRAKES WERE PULSATING AND THERE WAS EXCESSIVE DUST ON THE WHEELS, CONSUMER STATED THE DEFECT WAS THE FRONT ROTORS, WHICH WERE EVENTUALLY REPLACED, HOWEVER CONSUMER STATED THE DEALER DID NOT HONOR THE RECALL BEFORE OR AFTER THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED, THE DEALER ALSO CLEANED AND ADJUSTED THE REAR BRAKES.*JB

Apr 22, 2002

CONSUMER STATED THE BRAKES WERE NEVER SATISFACTORY FROM THE DATE OF PURCHASE, CONSUMER COMPLAINED TO THE DEALER BUT WAS ALWAYS TOLD THAT THE BRAKES WERE OK, THE BRAKES WERE PULSATING AND THERE WAS EXCESSIVE DUST ON THE WHEELS, CONSUMER STATED THE DEFECT WAS THE FRONT ROTORS, WHICH WERE EVENTUALLY REPLACED, HOWEVER CONSUMER STATED THE DEALER DID NOT HONOR THE RECALL BEFORE OR AFTER THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED, THE DEALER ALSO CLEANED AND ADJUSTED THE REAR BRAKES.*JB

Nov 15, 2000

REAR BRAKES RUSTED THROUGH THE DRUMS. *SLC

Mar 25, 1999

LOW BRAKE PEDAL DUE TO WORN REAR BRAKES, BRAKE SHOES REPLACED/DRUMS TURNED.

Mar 25, 1999

BRAKES PULSATE, PADS REPLACED/ROTORS TURNED.

Mar 25, 1999

BRAKES PULSATE, PADS REPLACED/ROTORS TURNED.

Mar 18, 1999

BRAKE POWER BOOSTER FAILED. (MJS)

Mar 18, 1999

BRAKE PADS AND ROTORS FAILED. (MJS)

Mar 18, 1999

BRAKE PADS AND ROTORS FAILED. (MJS)

Jan 29, 1999

EXPERIENCING VARIOUS PROBLEM WITH VEHICLE WITHIN 63,000 MILE OF WEARS,HAD TRANSMISSION REBUILT/REPLACED FUEL INJECTION SYSTEM, AND COMPLETE OVERHAUL OF BRAKES SYSTEM. DEALER WAS NOT CONTACTED / WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IS THIS CONSIDERED NORMAL. *AK

Nov 13, 1998

BRAKE PADS FAILED.

Aug 4, 1998

CONSUMER HAS BEEN EXPERIENCING BRAKE PROBLEMS WHILE DRIVING VEHICLE. THE EMERGENCY BRAKE FEELS LIKE IT IS ON, VEHICLE WILL NOT EXCEED 25 MPH .ALSO, THERE IS A STRONG SMELL OF SOMETHING BURNING. AFTER 10 MINUTES OR MORE THE VEHICLE WOULD RETURN BACK TO NORMAL. VEHICLE HAS BEEN AT DEALER ON THREE OCCASIONS. CONDITION HAS NOT BEEN RESOLVED AT THIS TIME. *AK

Aug 4, 1998

INTERMITTENTLY WHILE DRIVING THE VEHICLE WOULD SLOW DOWN AS IF THE BRAKES ARE BEING APPLIED. CONSUMER STATES THAT BRAKES HAVE BEEN APPLIED INTERNALLY. THE DEALER IS INSPECTING VEHICLE. *AK

Oct 15, 1997

BRAKE CALIPER BROKE.

Apr 16, 1997

ROTORS FAILED DUE TO CORROSION.

Apr 16, 1997

CALIPERS FAILED.

Apr 16, 1997

POWER BRAKE BOOSTER FAILED.

Jan 28, 1997

BRAKES FADE.

Dec 17, 1996

BRAKE ROTOR REPLACED.

Oct 15, 1996

FRONT DISC BRAKE ROTOR RECALL REPAIR REFUSED BY DEALER.

Aug 6, 1996 Crash

BRAKE BOOSTER FAILED, CAUSING ACCIDENT. *SD

Jun 17, 1996

GRINDING NOISE, METAL SHAVINGS ON THE OUSIDE OF TIRE. POSSIBLY DEFECTIVE BRAKE DRUM AND ROTOR. *AK

Nov 21, 1995

DEFECTIVE ROTOR AND POSSIBLE DEFECTIVE DISC. TT CONSUMER STATES FRONT DISCS WARPED. TRANSMISSION FAILED. *SLC

Oct 17, 1995

ABS BRAKE SYSTEM MALFUNCTIONED, LIGHT COMES ON AND THE BRAKES LOCKUP AND THEN RELEASE, DEALER CAN NOT LOCATE THE PROBLEM. TT

Jan 31, 1995

ABS BRAKES MAKE A VERY LOUD SQUEAKING NOISE AND ONLY STOP AT RANDOM. TT

Jan 31, 1995

FRONT BRAKE ROTORS/CALIPERS/PADS FAILED. *AK