12
Complaints
0
Crashes
0
Fires
0
Deaths

This Problem Across All Years

All Power Train Complaints

Showing 12 of 12
Jun 15, 2008 20,000 mi

I AM A CURRENT OWNER OF A 2006 MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE GT WITH A 6-SPEED MANUAL TRANSMISSION. I AM THE ONLY OWNER OF THIS VEHICLE. I HAVE LESS THAN 22,000 MILES ON THE VEHICLE AS OF TODAY AND RECENTLY I HAVE BEEN HEARING A NOISE COMING FROM MY TRANSMISSION WHILE I AM IN 'NEUTRAL.' I RECENTLY RETURNED TO THE DEALERSHIP FOR A 'PREVIOUS' RECALL SITUATION THAT NEEDED TO BE ADDRESSED. I QUESTIONED THE 'NOISE' AND I WAS TOLD THAT IT WAS THE 'THROW-OUT' BEARING ON THE CLUTCH. I ASKED IF THE PART CAN BE REPLACED AND IF IT WAS COVERED UNDER WARRANTY. I WAS TOLD IT WAS NOT COVERED UNDER WARRANTY AND THEY 'USUALLY' REPLACED THE ENTIRE CLUTCH DUE TO THE BEARING CAUSING DAMAGE TO THE CLUTCH ASSEMBLY ITSELF. WHEN I ASKED WHY THE BEARING WAS NOT COVERED, I WAS TOLD IT WAS A 'WEARABLE' PART. I WAS TOLD THAT THIS CLUTCH REPLACEMENT COULD COST AT LEAST $1,000. I HAVE BEEN DRIVING MANUAL TRANSMISSION-VEHICLES FOR OVER 13 YEARS AND HAVE NEVER HAD A 'CLUTCH' PROBLEM. THE PREVIOUS CARS I OWNED PRIOR TO THE ECLIPSE PURCHASE HAVE BEEN SOLD TO FAMILY AND FRIENDS AND THEY ALSO HAVE NOT HAD ANY PROBLEMS WITH THE CLUTCH. I CURRENTLY OWN A 20 YEAR OLD VEHICLE WITH ALMOST 200,000 MILES AND I HAVE NEVER HAD PROBLEM WITH THE CLUTCH. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CLUTCH IS A 'WEARABLE' PART, HOWEVER, I HAVE SEEN OTHER COMPLAINTS DEALING WITH THE SAME PROBLEM (COMPLAINT NUMBER: 10222679, 10224311, 10178777, 10173845, 10163231) AND I BELIEVE THAT A CLUTCH SHOULD NOT NEED REPLACING ALREADY IN A BRAND-NEW VEHICLE. I HAVE ALSO E-MAILED MITSUBISHI OVER TWO WEEKS AGO FOR ANY INFORMATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE AND I HAVE NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE. I FEEL THAT THIS IS VERY UNPROFESSIONAL BEING A CUSTOMER. I BELIEVE DUE TO MULTIPLE COMPLAINTS OF THE SAME ORIGIN, THAT THIS PART COULD BE 'FAULTY' AND SHOULD BE COVERED UNDER WARRANTY. I CONTINUE TO HAVE THE "NOISE" COMING FROM MY TRANSMISSION AND NO ASSISTANCE AND/OR INFORMATION FROM MITSUBISHI. AFTER THIS ORDEAL, I REFUSE TO EVER PURCHASE ANOTHER MITSUBISHI. *TR

Jun 15, 2008 20,000 mi

I AM A CURRENT OWNER OF A 2006 MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE GT WITH A 6-SPEED MANUAL TRANSMISSION. I AM THE ONLY OWNER OF THIS VEHICLE. I HAVE LESS THAN 22,000 MILES ON THE VEHICLE AS OF TODAY AND RECENTLY I HAVE BEEN HEARING A NOISE COMING FROM MY TRANSMISSION WHILE I AM IN 'NEUTRAL.' I RECENTLY RETURNED TO THE DEALERSHIP FOR A 'PREVIOUS' RECALL SITUATION THAT NEEDED TO BE ADDRESSED. I QUESTIONED THE 'NOISE' AND I WAS TOLD THAT IT WAS THE 'THROW-OUT' BEARING ON THE CLUTCH. I ASKED IF THE PART CAN BE REPLACED AND IF IT WAS COVERED UNDER WARRANTY. I WAS TOLD IT WAS NOT COVERED UNDER WARRANTY AND THEY 'USUALLY' REPLACED THE ENTIRE CLUTCH DUE TO THE BEARING CAUSING DAMAGE TO THE CLUTCH ASSEMBLY ITSELF. WHEN I ASKED WHY THE BEARING WAS NOT COVERED, I WAS TOLD IT WAS A 'WEARABLE' PART. I WAS TOLD THAT THIS CLUTCH REPLACEMENT COULD COST AT LEAST $1,000. I HAVE BEEN DRIVING MANUAL TRANSMISSION-VEHICLES FOR OVER 13 YEARS AND HAVE NEVER HAD A 'CLUTCH' PROBLEM. THE PREVIOUS CARS I OWNED PRIOR TO THE ECLIPSE PURCHASE HAVE BEEN SOLD TO FAMILY AND FRIENDS AND THEY ALSO HAVE NOT HAD ANY PROBLEMS WITH THE CLUTCH. I CURRENTLY OWN A 20 YEAR OLD VEHICLE WITH ALMOST 200,000 MILES AND I HAVE NEVER HAD PROBLEM WITH THE CLUTCH. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CLUTCH IS A 'WEARABLE' PART, HOWEVER, I HAVE SEEN OTHER COMPLAINTS DEALING WITH THE SAME PROBLEM (COMPLAINT NUMBER: 10222679, 10224311, 10178777, 10173845, 10163231) AND I BELIEVE THAT A CLUTCH SHOULD NOT NEED REPLACING ALREADY IN A BRAND-NEW VEHICLE. I HAVE ALSO E-MAILED MITSUBISHI OVER TWO WEEKS AGO FOR ANY INFORMATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE AND I HAVE NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE. I FEEL THAT THIS IS VERY UNPROFESSIONAL BEING A CUSTOMER. I BELIEVE DUE TO MULTIPLE COMPLAINTS OF THE SAME ORIGIN, THAT THIS PART COULD BE 'FAULTY' AND SHOULD BE COVERED UNDER WARRANTY. I CONTINUE TO HAVE THE "NOISE" COMING FROM MY TRANSMISSION AND NO ASSISTANCE AND/OR INFORMATION FROM MITSUBISHI. AFTER THIS ORDEAL, I REFUSE TO EVER PURCHASE ANOTHER MITSUBISHI. *TR

Apr 12, 2008 16,500 mi

4 MONTHS AGO I HAD THE SLAVE CYLINDER LEAK ONTO MY CLUTCH CAUSING THE CLUTCH TO GO OUT, THEY REPLACED IT BASICALLY TOLD ME I HAVE A NEW CLUTCH. SO RECENTLY I'VE BEEN GETTING ON THE FREEWAY IN 5TH 6TH GEAR AND THE CAR IS REVVING BUT NOT GOING, SO I WENT BACK TO THE SAME DEALER TOLD THEM WHAT'S UP AND WITHOUT EVEN DIAGNOSING THE PROBLEM SAID I NEED A NEW CLUTCH, I THEN REMINDED THEM I JUST HAD IT REPLACED 4 MONTHS AGO THEY TRIED TO SAY IT WAS FOR SOMETHING ELSE WHEN IN FACT I REMEMBER HIM CLEARLY SAYING YOU GOT A BRAND NEW CLUTCH. ANYWAY I ASKED HOW MUCH TO FIX IT HE SAID $1,400.00 I THEN ASKED IS IT NORMAL TO HAVE IT GO OUT SO SOON BUT HE IS STILL TRYING TO CONVINCE ME THEY JUST REPLACED THE BEARINGS ON THE CLUTCH. THEN ASKED IF I DRIVE IT HARD. WELL I NEVER RACE IT I DRIVE TO AND FROM WORK THAT'S ABOUT IT, OH AND THE CAR ONLY HAS 16500 MILES ON IT. I THEN CALLED THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT TO FIND OUT ABOUT THE WARRANTY THEY SAID ITS NOT COVERED , I DON'T KNOW IM SO MAD ABOUT THIS I LOVE THE CAR BUT HATE THE PEOPLE BEHIND IT! *TR

Apr 12, 2008 16,500 mi

4 MONTHS AGO I HAD THE SLAVE CYLINDER LEAK ONTO MY CLUTCH CAUSING THE CLUTCH TO GO OUT, THEY REPLACED IT BASICALLY TOLD ME I HAVE A NEW CLUTCH. SO RECENTLY I'VE BEEN GETTING ON THE FREEWAY IN 5TH 6TH GEAR AND THE CAR IS REVVING BUT NOT GOING, SO I WENT BACK TO THE SAME DEALER TOLD THEM WHAT'S UP AND WITHOUT EVEN DIAGNOSING THE PROBLEM SAID I NEED A NEW CLUTCH, I THEN REMINDED THEM I JUST HAD IT REPLACED 4 MONTHS AGO THEY TRIED TO SAY IT WAS FOR SOMETHING ELSE WHEN IN FACT I REMEMBER HIM CLEARLY SAYING YOU GOT A BRAND NEW CLUTCH. ANYWAY I ASKED HOW MUCH TO FIX IT HE SAID $1,400.00 I THEN ASKED IS IT NORMAL TO HAVE IT GO OUT SO SOON BUT HE IS STILL TRYING TO CONVINCE ME THEY JUST REPLACED THE BEARINGS ON THE CLUTCH. THEN ASKED IF I DRIVE IT HARD. WELL I NEVER RACE IT I DRIVE TO AND FROM WORK THAT'S ABOUT IT, OH AND THE CAR ONLY HAS 16500 MILES ON IT. I THEN CALLED THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT TO FIND OUT ABOUT THE WARRANTY THEY SAID ITS NOT COVERED , I DON'T KNOW IM SO MAD ABOUT THIS I LOVE THE CAR BUT HATE THE PEOPLE BEHIND IT! *TR

Mar 29, 2008 28,529 mi

2006 MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE SPUN 3 MAIN BEARINGS, HAS A WORN CLUTCH AT 28,000 MILES. I HAVE NEVER REPLACED THE CLUTCH IN MY '88 MAZDA, WHICH CURRENTLY HAS 190,000 MILES ON IT OR ANY OF THE PREVIOUS MANUAL TRANSMISSION VEHICLES I HAVE OWNED. MITSUBISHI REPS DENIED THE WARRANTY DUE TO AFTERMARKET PART (COLD AIR INTAKE) THE CLUTCH BEING WORN AND FROM WHAT THEY CLAIM AS "SPIRITED DRIVING." I DID NOT PAY $30,000 FOR A CAR TO TAKE OUT AND DRIVE IT LIKE A MANIAC. THIS IS A CAR THAT I TAKE VERY GOOD CARE OF AND CHANGE OIL EVERY 3,000 MILES RELIGIOUSLY, AND HAVE IT SERVICED REGULARLY. I HAD A DISPUTE HEARING ON THIS MATTER AND THAT WAS A JOKE, YOU BETTER HAVE SOMEONE TO GO WITH YOU THAT HAS IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF ENGINES AND COLD AIR INTAKES. I KNOW THAT THE COLD AIR INTAKE DOES NOT CHANGE THE PARAMETERS OF THE ENGINE SET BY THE MANUFACTURER, SINCE I HAD CONTACTED THE COMPANY THAT DEVELOPED THE INTAKE. I WILL NEVER BUY ANOTHER MITSUBISHI IN MY LIFE. THEY DO NOT STAND BEHIND THEIR WARRANTIES OR THEIR PRODUCTS. I WILL NEVER RECOMMEND A MITSUBISHI VEHICLE TO ANYBODY. I WILL ALSO NOT RECOMMEND THE DEALERSHIP TO ANYONE EITHER. THEY WAS OF NO HELP TO ME WHAT SO EVER. *TR

Mar 29, 2008 28,529 mi

2006 MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE SPUN 3 MAIN BEARINGS, HAS A WORN CLUTCH AT 28,000 MILES. I HAVE NEVER REPLACED THE CLUTCH IN MY '88 MAZDA, WHICH CURRENTLY HAS 190,000 MILES ON IT OR ANY OF THE PREVIOUS MANUAL TRANSMISSION VEHICLES I HAVE OWNED. MITSUBISHI REPS DENIED THE WARRANTY DUE TO AFTERMARKET PART (COLD AIR INTAKE) THE CLUTCH BEING WORN AND FROM WHAT THEY CLAIM AS "SPIRITED DRIVING." I DID NOT PAY $30,000 FOR A CAR TO TAKE OUT AND DRIVE IT LIKE A MANIAC. THIS IS A CAR THAT I TAKE VERY GOOD CARE OF AND CHANGE OIL EVERY 3,000 MILES RELIGIOUSLY, AND HAVE IT SERVICED REGULARLY. I HAD A DISPUTE HEARING ON THIS MATTER AND THAT WAS A JOKE, YOU BETTER HAVE SOMEONE TO GO WITH YOU THAT HAS IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF ENGINES AND COLD AIR INTAKES. I KNOW THAT THE COLD AIR INTAKE DOES NOT CHANGE THE PARAMETERS OF THE ENGINE SET BY THE MANUFACTURER, SINCE I HAD CONTACTED THE COMPANY THAT DEVELOPED THE INTAKE. I WILL NEVER BUY ANOTHER MITSUBISHI IN MY LIFE. THEY DO NOT STAND BEHIND THEIR WARRANTIES OR THEIR PRODUCTS. I WILL NEVER RECOMMEND A MITSUBISHI VEHICLE TO ANYBODY. I WILL ALSO NOT RECOMMEND THE DEALERSHIP TO ANYONE EITHER. THEY WAS OF NO HELP TO ME WHAT SO EVER. *TR

Jan 16, 2007 33,600 mi

CLUTCH WORE OFF AT 33000 MILES AND NOT EVEN ONE YEAR. I'VE BEEN DRIVING MANUAL FOR TEN YEARS AND NEVER HAD TO REPLACE CLUTCH ON MY 97 NISSAN TRUCK. I STILL HAVE THE OLD CAR WITHOUT EVER HAVING TO REPLACE THE CLUTCH AND NOW A NEW 2006 ECLIPSE BURN OUT AFTER LESS THAN A YEAR. DEALER SAID THAT IT ISN'T COVERED BY WARRANTY BECAUSE ITS WEARABLE BUT I THINK IT SHOULD BE PART OF THE POWERTRAIN WARRANTY FOR 100000 OR TEN YEARS. *JB

Jan 16, 2007 33,600 mi

CLUTCH WORE OFF AT 33000 MILES AND NOT EVEN ONE YEAR. I'VE BEEN DRIVING MANUAL FOR TEN YEARS AND NEVER HAD TO REPLACE CLUTCH ON MY 97 NISSAN TRUCK. I STILL HAVE THE OLD CAR WITHOUT EVER HAVING TO REPLACE THE CLUTCH AND NOW A NEW 2006 ECLIPSE BURN OUT AFTER LESS THAN A YEAR. DEALER SAID THAT IT ISN'T COVERED BY WARRANTY BECAUSE ITS WEARABLE BUT I THINK IT SHOULD BE PART OF THE POWERTRAIN WARRANTY FOR 100000 OR TEN YEARS. *JB

Nov 20, 2006 8,800 mi

RE MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE, 2006, 8,000+ MILES. WITH NO PRIOR SIGNS OR ODORS, RPMS FLUCTUATED IN 5TH GEAR AT 65 MPH REDUCED TO 30 MPH. VEHICLE WAS PULLED OVER AND THEN WOULD NOT PROCEED IN GEAR. TAKEN TO DEALERSHIP AND TOLD CLUTCH WAS WORN; PARTS WERE REPLACED. FAILURE WAS BLAMED ON DRIVER, BUT THERE IS REASON TO BELIEVE THE CLUTCH WAS FAULTY FROM START. *NM

Nov 20, 2006 8,800 mi

RE MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE, 2006, 8,000+ MILES. WITH NO PRIOR SIGNS OR ODORS, RPMS FLUCTUATED IN 5TH GEAR AT 65 MPH REDUCED TO 30 MPH. VEHICLE WAS PULLED OVER AND THEN WOULD NOT PROCEED IN GEAR. TAKEN TO DEALERSHIP AND TOLD CLUTCH WAS WORN; PARTS WERE REPLACED. FAILURE WAS BLAMED ON DRIVER, BUT THERE IS REASON TO BELIEVE THE CLUTCH WAS FAULTY FROM START. *NM

Jul 23, 2006 9,640 mi

I HAVE A 2006 ECLIPSE GT, ITS ONLY 7 MONTHS OLD AND HAS LESS THAN 10,000 MILES ON IT. IM DRIVING ALONG AND I SHIFT GEARS AND I HEARD IT REV UP BEFORE IT CAUGHT AND STARTED TO ACCELERATE. NONE THE LESS, I FIND OUT ITS THE CLUTCH GOING OUT ALREADY. AND THE DEALERSHIP WONT REPLACE IT BECAUSE ITS A WEAR ITEM... BUT WHAT CLUTCH GOES OUT IN LESS THAN 10,000 MILES WHEN THE CAR ISN'T DRIVEN LIKE A RACE CAR, BUT NORMAL. *NM

Jul 23, 2006 9,640 mi

I HAVE A 2006 ECLIPSE GT, ITS ONLY 7 MONTHS OLD AND HAS LESS THAN 10,000 MILES ON IT. IM DRIVING ALONG AND I SHIFT GEARS AND I HEARD IT REV UP BEFORE IT CAUGHT AND STARTED TO ACCELERATE. NONE THE LESS, I FIND OUT ITS THE CLUTCH GOING OUT ALREADY. AND THE DEALERSHIP WONT REPLACE IT BECAUSE ITS A WEAR ITEM... BUT WHAT CLUTCH GOES OUT IN LESS THAN 10,000 MILES WHEN THE CAR ISN'T DRIVEN LIKE A RACE CAR, BUT NORMAL. *NM