1993 TOYOTA PICKUP Structure Problems

I BOUGHT A 1993 4X4 TOYOTA PICKUP USED AND DISCOVERED IT IS RUSTED WORSE THAN ANY OTHER VEHICLE IVE EVER SEEN. THE FRAME IS RUSTED INTO IN MULTIPLE PLACES, THE BRAKE LINES HAVE RUSTED OFF AND I'VE LOST ALL BRAKES SO I CANT DRIVE IT AT ALL NOW. IT RUNS AND GOES GREAT OR WELL IT DID UNTILL FRAME BROKE AND BRAKES WENT OUT. APPARENTLY 1993 FRAMES ARE THE WORST FRAMES TO HAVE ACCORDING TO EVERYTHING IVE SEEN ONLINE. WHAT BOTHERS ME IS I HAVE A 1991 TWO WHEEL DRIVE TOYOTA TRUCK JUST LIKE IT AND IT DOESN'T HAVE ANY RUST AT ALL NOWHERE ON FRAME OR BODY. AND BOTH TRUCKS ARE FROM THE SAME AREA. THE 4X4 THATS LITERALLY A DEATH TRAP ONLY HAS 220000 MILES ON IT WHICH IS NOTHING REALLY. THE ONLY REASON I EVEN BOUGHT THE TRUCK IS BECAUSE TOYOTA TRUCKS ARE KNOWN TO GO 3,4,OR SOMETIMES 500000 MILES WITH HARDLEY ANY TROUBLE. I WOULD JUST LOVE TO B ABLE TO DRIVE MY TRUCK AGAIN, THATS ALL I WANT. THERE SHOULD DEFINITELY B A RECALL FOR EXTREME FRAME AND BODY RUST. IT SHOULDN'T B THAT RUSTY, IT'S LITERALLY THE WORST IVE EVER SEEN

Mileage: 220,000

FRAME RUSTED SO THAT IT BREAKS UNDER JACKUP FORCES FRAME RAILS CRUSH UNDER UNLOADED VEHICLES WEIGHT

Mileage: 100,000

WHILE DRIVING THE TRUCK IT MAKES A REALLY LOUD GRINDING/WHINING NOISE. FRAME IS BROKEN RIGHT UNDER THE BACK OF THE CAB AND FRONT OF THE BED FROM RUST CAUSING THE DRIVE LINE TO BREAK (GRINDING/WHINING NOISE). WAS TOLD BY MECHANIC THAT IT IS UNSAFE TO DRIVE. I WAS SCARED TO DEATH DRIVING BACK TO MY HOUSE FROM THE SHOP AND BEING FEMALE THE LAST THING I WANT IS FOR IT TO BREAK IN HALF AND BE STUCK ALONG THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. A COUPLE YEARS AGO I ALSO HAD TO HAVE THE FUEL TANK AND FUEL LINES REPLACED BECAUSE OF IT RUSTING OUT AND CAUSING FUEL TO LEAK OUT. ANOTHER SAFETY ISSUE. BOTH OF THESE ARE SAFETY ISSUES THAT IF I DIDN'T FIND OUT COULD HAVE TURNED OUT REALLY BADLY BY EITHER FIRE, CRASH AND BOTH COULD HAVE CAUSED DEATH. WHY THIS YEAR OF TRUCK ISN'T INCLUDED IN THE 1995+ RECALL OF THE FRAME RUSTING IS BEYOND ME. TOYOTA KNOWS IT IS HAPPENING NOW THEY JUST NEED TO MAKE IT RIGHT.

Mileage: 99,000

FRAME RAIL RUSTING THROUGH AT SPRING MOUNT. OPEN RECALL FOR 1995 AND LATER BUT DOES NOT COVER 1993/94 OR OLDER

Mileage: 114,000

THE FRAME IS COMPLETELY RUSTED THROUGH. CORROSION IS THROUGHOUT THE FRAME AND THE FRAME NEAR THE REAR LEAF SPRING MOUNT HAS A 7 INCH BY 1 INCH HOLE FROM RUST WHICH JOINS WITH A CRACK IN THE FRAME BETWEEN THE FIRST HOLE AND A SECOND RUST HOLE. RUST AND CORROSION IS THROUGHOUT THE FRAME AND SUSPENSION PARTS. I'VE NEVER SEEN ANY FRAME THIS BAD. SPRINGS, A-ARMS, AND ALL MANNER OF SUSPENSION AND BODY PARTS ARE CORRODED BADLY.

Mileage: 189,000

TURN THE WHEEL ON MY 1993 4X4STARTED TO BACK UP HEARD A POP AN LOST MY 4 WHEEL DRIVE. SO GOT OUT TO LOOK AN THE FRONT FRAME BROKE, AN MY CV SHAFT PULLED APART. I ONLY HAVE 164,635 MILES WOW COME ON TOYOTA THAT'S CRAZY. *TR

Mileage: 164,635

SEVERE RUST PERFORATION OCCURRING IN FRAME OF VEHICLE ( 1993 TOYOTA PICK-UP) TOYOTA CUSTOMER SERVICE INFORMED ME NOTHING COULD BE DONE FOR THIS YEAR OF VEHICLE.( COMPLAINT REF. NO. [XXX] FILED WITH TOYOTA CUSTOMER SERVICE ON 1/21/10 ) ----PROGRAM IS IN PLACE FOR 1995 - 2005 TRUCKS WITH SAME PROBLEM. JUST WANTED TO INFORM THE NHTSA THAT EARLIER MODEL TRUCKS ARE EXPERIENCING THE SAME ISSUES. [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1993 TOYOTA TACOMA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING, A CLUNKING SOUND WOULD COME FROM UNDER THE VEHICLE. UPON INSPECTION, THE CONTACT NOTICED THERE WAS MASSIVE RUST ON THE FRAME. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO A DEALER AND THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 191,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 195,000.

Mileage: 191,000

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1993 TOYOTA TACOMA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING, A CLUNKING SOUND WOULD COME FROM UNDER THE VEHICLE. UPON INSPECTION, THE CONTACT NOTICED THERE WAS MASSIVE RUST ON THE FRAME. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO A DEALER AND THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 191,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 195,000.

Mileage: 191,000

I WAS REMOVING THE GAS TANK DUE TO A FUEL LEAK AND FOUND THAT THE FRAME HAD RUSTED HEAVILY AND ENTIRE SECTIONS OF THE FRAME BOX WALL WERE GONE. TOYOTA HAD A VOLUNTARY BUYBACK PROGRAM FOR 1995-2004 PICKUP TRUCKS DUE TO EXTREME FRAME RUSTING. I HAVE NEVER SEEN FRAME RUST THIS BAD. TOYOTA SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO EXTEND THE BUYBACK PROGRAM TO 1993 MODELS OR RECALL THE VEHICLES AND REPAIR THEM. PICTURES ARE AVAILABLE. *TR

Mileage: 178,000

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1993 TOYOTA PICKUP. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WOULD JERK SPORADICALLY AND PULL ABNORMALLY WHEN APPLYING THE BRAKES. THERE WAS ALSO RUSTING ON THE FRAME OF THE VEHICLE AND THE EXTERIOR HEAD LIGHTS WERE ABNORMALLY DIM. THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER DENIED ANY ASSISTANCE WITH REPAIRS TO THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 176,000.

Mileage: 176,000

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1993 TOYOTA PICKUP. THE CONTACT STATED THE SPRING SHACKLE THAT WAS WELDED TO THE REAR FRAME OF THE VEHICLE, WAS COVERED WITH RUST. THE CONTACT STATED THE SPRING SHACKLE WELL ALSO DETACHED AND IT ALLOWED THE SPRINGS TO HANG. THE CONTACT STATED THE SPRING WAS DANGLING NEXT TO THE FUEL TANK. THE CONTACT WAS CONCERNED THAT THE FRAME WOULD COMPLETELY BREAK IN HALF. THE FAILURE MILEAGE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 204,000. UPDATED 5/24/11 *CN UPDATED 1/24/2012 *LN *TR

Mileage: 204,000

I PURCHASED IN 1993 A BRAND NEW TOYOTA 4WD DX PICKUP FROM A TOYOTA DEALERSHIP. I HAVE PROPERLY MAINTAINED THE VEHICLE FOLLOWING ALL THE TOYOTA GUIDELINES AND CURRENTLY THE TRUCK STILL LOOKS SHOWROOM NEW. I HAVE RECEIVED MANY COMPLIMENTS ON HOW NICE MY 1993 TRUCK LOOKS INCLUDING MANY OFFERS TO PURCHASE MY VEHICLE. HOWEVER, OVER THE LAST TWO YEARS MY ASE CERTIFIED MECHANIC HAS STATED TO ME THAT THE FRAME IS PREMATURELY RUSTING AND IT IS GETTING PRETTY BAD. WHEN I JUST RECENTLY HAD A TIRE ROTATION PERFORMED, HE SUGGESTED THAT THE PROBLEM HAS ESCALATED AND NEEDS TO BE EVALUATED BY THE TOYOTA DEALERSHIP. ON MAY 20, 2009 I HAD AN APPOINTMENT WITH THE DEALERSHIP TO EXAMINE THE TRUCK FRAME AND ADVISE ME OF THE SITUATION. THEY EXPLAINED TO ME THAT THE VEHICLE FRAME WAS HEAVILY CORRODED AND PERFORATED BEYOND THE NORMAL SURFACE RUST FOUND ON VEHICLES AFTER YEARS OF EXPOSURE IN THE NORTHEAST. THEY FURTHER STATED THAT THE TRUCK WAS PROBABLY UNSAFE TO DRIVE IN ITS CURRENT STATE. I RESPONDED TO THEM THAT I WAS AWARE THAT THE TOYOTA MANUFACTURING COMPANY HAD A CAMPAIGN TO RECALL THE TOYOTA PICKUPS FROM 1995 AND UP WITH THE SAME PROBLEMS AND HAVE BEEN EITHER REPAIRING OR REPLACING THE FRAMES OF MANY AFFECTED VEHICLES. I CONTINUED BY ASKING IF TOYOTA WOULD RESOLVE MY PROBLEM AND THEY STATED THAT THEY WOULD NOT AND THAT I SHOULD CALL THE TOYOTA MANUFACTURER CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT AND REQUEST THAT A CASE BE OPENED AND ASK FOR ASSISTANCE. I DID AS REQUESTED BY THE DEALER AND WAS TOLD BY THE CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE THAT THEY WOULD MAKE A RECORD OF MY COMPLAINT BUT THAT THEY WERE ONLY RESOLVING THE PICKUPS FROM 1995 AND UP AND THAT IN NO WAY WOULD THEY HELP ME WHATSOEVER. NOW HERE I AM WITH A BEAUTIFUL 1993 TOYOTA PICKUP TRUCK THAT WOULD BE VERY EXPENSIVE FOR ME TO FIX, IS NOW UNSAFE TO BE DRIVEN ON THE ROAD AND WILL PROBABLY NEED TO BE PICKED BY A TOW TRUCK AND HAULED AWAY TO A JUNKYARD. *TR

Mileage: 118,883

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1993 TOYOTA PICKUP. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE'S FRAME FAILED THE MANUFACTURER'S INSPECTION. A PORTION OF THE FRAME HAS SINCE BEEN REPAIRED; HOWEVER, TOYOTA WILL NOT REPAIR OR REPLACE THE VEHICLE. THE CONTACT FEELS THAT THE VEHICLE IS UNSAFE TO DRIVE BECAUSE THE FRAME COULD FALL APART WHILE DRIVING. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 198,000 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 190,000.

Mileage: 190,000

FRONT CROSS MEMBER IS FALLING OFF WHILE DRIVING. ALSO VEHICLE HAS VARIOUS PROBLEMS, INCLUDING BRAKES FAILURES/ELECTRICAL FAILURES,ETC. CONSUMER IS VERY CONCERNED FOR SAFETY. *AK

CLUTCH PRESSURE PLATE IS MADE OF DIFFERENT MATERIAL THAT IS TOO THIN, CAUSING IT TO SLIP. *AK THE SPRING LOADED PORTIONS OF THE CLUTCH PRESSURE PLATE, WERE NOT OF ROBUST ENOUGH CONSTRUCTION TO WITHSTAND THE FREQUENT MANUAL CHANGING OF GEARS, 13000 MILES LATER, THE SAME PROBLEM STARTED TO REOCCUR, DEALER FOUND NO PROBLEMS, TWO MONTHS LATER CLUTCH FAILED, CONSUMER STATES PROBLEM STILL EXITSTS. DRIVER SIDE SEAT BELT REPLACED AND FAILED WITHIN 16000 MILES, PASSENGER SIDE SEAT BELT LOOKS DETERIORATED, CONSUMER STATES THE PROBLEM APPEARS TO BE THE MECHANISM WHICH CAUSES THE BELT TO LOCK UP IN THE CASE OF A HEAVY JOLT IS TOO FRAGILE, SO WHEN TRAVELING ON ROADS WITH HEAVY VIBRATION, IT REPEATEDLY LOCKS UP AND BECOMES TOO TIGHT, CUTTING INTO CONSUMER'S NECK. CONSUMER STATES FRONT SUSPENSION IS OF INFERIOR STABILITY AND VEHICLE IS EASY TO LOSE CONTROL WHEN NEEDING TO SWERVE, CONSUMER DID LOSE CONTROL AND HAD AN ACCIDENT, VEHICLE CLIPPED A GUARDRAIL DUE TO FAULTY SUSPENSION SYSTEM, THE BUMPER IS ATTACHED TO THE FRAME BY ONLY ONE BOLT CAUSING IT TO PIVOT IN THE ACCIDENT, REAR SPRINGS COLLAPSED AT ONLY 30000 MILES WHILE HAVING ONLY A CAMPER SHELL, REAR SPRINGS ONLY HAVE 2 SMALL LEAVES TO WHICH THE SHOCKS ARE LIGHT WEIGHT UNDER SIZE, A DELAER REPLACED THE SHOCKS BECAUSE THEY BEGAN TO LEAK, CONSUMER WAS ADVISED TO MODIFY THE SPRINGS BY ADDING AN EXTRA LEAVE. *SLC

DOOR SWITCHES REPLACED.

LEFT SIDE DOOR TRIM PANEL REPLACED.